Policy Statement 17, Recommendation C
Consider information related to the individual's strengths and service needs insofar as these issues affect public safety and/or the establishment of terms and conditions of release.
While the risk assessment should provide an objective and validated prediction of future criminality and recidivism, it may or may not take into account all of the dynamic factors related to an individual's strengths and needs. These factors may affect both decisions about the safety of releasing the individual and the release conditions that should be set. To that end, transition team planners should review the following factors as they pertain to each individual:
Where a particular risk assessment instrument does not take into account these dynamic factors at all or simply not to a sufficient level of specificity, it is particularly important that the transition team collect this information from the individual, his or her family, and any other records available.
Example: Personal History Statement and Social Investigation, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
In making release decisions, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles reviews a Personal History Statement and a Social Investigation in addition to performing a legal investigation. The Personal History Statement, which the person seeking release dictates to a parole officer during an interview, consists of a series of demographic questions and the individual's account of his or her offense. The Social Investigation allows the parole officer to verify information in the Personal History Statement and gather additional details about the person's background and the circumstances of his or her offense through interviews with one or more family members.

