D: Managing the Key Transition Period

3: State officials often have discretion in how they apply the 1996 welfare law and can opt out of the ban completely.

In this chapter:

  • Overview
  • Recommendations:
  • Research Highlights:
  • States can opt out of the welfare ban completely or narrow it, but only through legislation. Otherwise, the ban is permanent and continues regardless of a person's successful job history, participation in drug treatment, abstinence from drug use, or avoidance of recidivism. Seventeen states are enforcing the ban and denying TANF assistance and food stamps to all individuals with felony drug convictions. [1]   Twenty-one states have enacted legislation to make individuals with felony drug convictions eligible for some or all TANF and food stamp benefits. For example, individuals who have completed treatment or who are currently in treatment remain eligible in Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Nevada, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Twelve states (Idaho, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Vermont) and the District of Columbia place no restrictions on TANF eligibility for individuals with felony drug convictions.

    1. Legal Action Center, After Prison: Roadblocks to Reentry, A Report on State Legal Barriers Facing People with Criminal Records (New York, NY: Legal Action Center) .

      back