III: Elements of Effective Health and Social Service Systems

Policy Statement 34: Children and Family Systems

Support interagency efforts to enhance child welfare and other human services programs supporting children and families; increase coordination among criminal justice, workforce, and human services systems; and expand the capacity of community-based programs serving children and families.

Recommendation C: Strengthen access and service delivery for families in the child welfare program.

Children in the child welfare system are disproportionately children of color; have families struggling with complex problems related to poverty, domestic violence, and substance abuse; and are at risk for health, mental health, and developmental problems. [1]   Need different cite? Formerly "children of incarcerated parents, like most children in the child welfare system" Child welfare programs deal with overwhelming caseloads, high staff turnover, poor information management systems, and limited resources. [2]   Judicial dockets are similarly strained: courts lack sufficient resources and tools to improve oversight of child welfare cases; and parents, foster parents, and children often lack quality legal representation. [3]   Parents and foster parents report that they have trouble getting information and having a sufficient voice in decision-making. [4]   At the same time, children and families often do not receive the services they need. [5]   Critics find that the child welfare funding and program structure is inflexible and encourages over-reliance on the placement of children in foster care. [6]  

Given all of these concerns, the child welfare system should improve service delivery to children and families, including those with incarcerated parents, in a number of ways:

  • Many experts agree that child welfare financing should be reprioritized at the federal level so that it encourages more individualized, family-centered, preventative, and innovative services to children and families, instead of focusing resources so heavily on foster care placements. [7]  
  • Court resources should be allocated to improve judicial oversight of child welfare cases, parental access to judicial proceedings and mediation, effective collaboration with child welfare agencies, improved training, and accountability for child outcomes. [8]  
  • Policies to encourage kinship care arrangements, which entail placement of children with relatives instead of an unknown foster family, should be adopted by the child welfare program. Such placements can help parents and children who are separated from each other maintain their relationship, while providing some stability for children. [9]  
  • The program should improve supportive services to kinship families, as well as non-relative foster families. [10]   Such services include mental health, substance abuse treatment, parenting courses, employment services, housing aid, and financial assistance.
  • The child welfare service mandate should be expanded to include and improve services specifically designed for families of incarcerated parents. Further, the program should improve data collection and develop a research agenda focused on children with incarcerated parents. [11]  
  • The child welfare program should collaborate with corrections departments to provide families of incarcerated parents with needed supports; facilitate visits and other contact between incarcerated parents and their children whenever feasible and prudent; and help families plan for re-entry. [12]   (See Policy Statement 13, Children and Families, and Policy Statement 23, Victims, Families, and Communities, for more on facilitation of family relationships during an individual's incarceration and transition period).
  • Permanency planning for the children of incarcerated parents should take into account the special challenges of these families, including lengthy prison sentences that often exceed statutory time frames for presumptive termination of parental rights. (See Epilogue for more on federal restrictions for re-entering parents.) Child welfare programs should make reasonable efforts to encourage reunification where appropriate. Incarcerated parents, like all parents, should be given a fair opportunity to participate in permanency planning and judicial proceedings. [13]  

The child welfare program and the criminal justice system share many of the same families. By improving cross-system coordination and service delivery, the child welfare program can help improve the chances of successful family reunification after incarceration.

  1. Sandra Stukes Chipungu and Tricia B. Bent-Goodley, "Meeting the Challenges of Contemporary Foster Care," Children, Families, and Foster Care 14, no.1 (Winter 2004); Susan Chinball, et al., Children of Color in the Child Welfare System: Perspectives from the Child Welfare Community (Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services Children's Bureau, ACS, 2003-12-01) ; No citation found for FN_children-with-parents-in-prison-child-welfare-policy-program-and-practice-issues! .

    back
  2. No citation found for FN_every-door-closed-barriers-facing-parents-with-criminal-records! ; No citation found for FN_working-with-children-and-families-separated-by-incarceration! .

    back
  3. Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care, Fostering the Future: Safety, Permanency, and Well-being for Children in Foster Care (Washington, DC, 2004), 9-10.

    back
  4. No citation found for FN_voices-from-the-inside! .

    back
  5. Ibid.; Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care, Fostering the Future: Safety, Permanency, and Well-being for Children in Foster Care (Washington, DC, 2004), ES 1-2, 11-13.

    back
  6. Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care, Fostering the Future: Safety, Permanency, and Well-being for Children in Foster Care (Washington, DC, 2004), 1.

    back
  7. Ibid.; Kristen Shook Slack, "Making a Real Commitment to Prevention Efforts: Reforming the ‘Front-End' of Child Welfare," Poverty Research News, (Chicago, IL: Joint Center for Poverty Research 2002), 4-5.

    back
  8. Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care, Fostering the Future: Safety, Permanency, and Well-being for Children in Foster Care (Washington, DC, 2004), 3 No citation found for FN_family-group-decision-making-in-colorado! , ES i-iii; No citation found for FN_dependency-mediation-in-colorados-fourth-judicial-district! ES 1-4.

    back
  9. "Kinship care" refers to situations where a child is placed with a relative, rather than an unknown or unrelated foster parent.

    back
  10. No citation found for FN_where-children-live-when-parents-are-incarcerated! ; Elizabeth Johnson and Jane Waldfogel, Children of Incarcerated Parents: Cumulative Risk and Children's Living Arrangements (University of Chicago, Joint Center for Poverty Research, 2002-07-17), 3-5 ; No citation found for FN_working-with-children-and-families-separated-by-incarceration! Mary Bissell and Jennifer Miller, Using Subsidized Guardianship to Improve Outcomes for Children (Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund and Cornerstone Consulting Group, 2004), 1-2.

    back
  11. No citation found for FN_children-with-parents-in-prison-child-welfare-policy-program-and-practice-issues! ; No citation found for FN_working-with-children-and-families-separated-by-incarceration! .

    back
  12. No citation found for FN_building-partnerships! ; No citation found for FN_every-door-closed-barriers-facing-parents-with-criminal-records! .

    back
  13. Johnson and Waldfogel, Where Children Live, 2; Philip M. Genty, "Permanency Planning in the Context of Parental Incarceration: Legal Issues and Recommendations," Special Issue: Children with Parents in Prison, Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America (Sept./Oct. 1998), 545-549; Timothy Ross, Ajay Khashu, and Mark Wamsley, Hard Data on Hard Times: An Empirical Analysis of Maternal Incarceration, Foster Care, and Visitation, Report to NYC Administration for Children's Services, New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice, ES 1-3.

    back
Explore the Justice Center’s Websites
CSG Justice Center Criminal Justice / Mental Health Consensus Project Justice Reinvestment National Reentry Resource Center Reentry Policy Council